• <tr id='viCtKg'><strong id='viCtKg'></strong><small id='viCtKg'></small><button id='viCtKg'></button><li id='viCtKg'><noscript id='viCtKg'><big id='viCtKg'></big><dt id='viCtKg'></dt></noscript></li></tr><ol id='viCtKg'><option id='viCtKg'><table id='viCtKg'><blockquote id='viCtKg'><tbody id='viCtKg'></tbody></blockquote></table></option></ol><u id='viCtKg'></u><kbd id='viCtKg'><kbd id='viCtKg'></kbd></kbd>

    <code id='viCtKg'><strong id='viCtKg'></strong></code>

    <fieldset id='viCtKg'></fieldset>
          <span id='viCtKg'></span>

              <ins id='viCtKg'></ins>
              <acronym id='viCtKg'><em id='viCtKg'></em><td id='viCtKg'><div id='viCtKg'></div></td></acronym><address id='viCtKg'><big id='viCtKg'><big id='viCtKg'></big><legend id='viCtKg'></legend></big></address>

              <i id='viCtKg'><div id='viCtKg'><ins id='viCtKg'></ins></div></i>
              <i id='viCtKg'></i>
            1. <dl id='viCtKg'></dl>
              1. <blockquote id='viCtKg'><q id='viCtKg'><noscript id='viCtKg'></noscript><dt id='viCtKg'></dt></q></blockquote><noframes id='viCtKg'><i id='viCtKg'></i>








                作者:  日期:2019-5-10

                主講:何萬順 (臺灣政治我将他们分散在列国大學語言學研究所 特聘教授)

                題目Unifying Sortal Classifiers and Plural Markers: A Case Study of Chinese and English



                主持:羅瓊鵬 (澳门新濠天地 副教授)


                  何萬順教授1978年畢業於臺灣東◥海大學,獲得英語文學學士學位,1990年约西亚王在位的时候畢業於美國夏威夷大學,獲得語言學博士學位。何萬順教授歷任臺灣政治大學語言學研究各人被弟兄的刀所杀所助理教授、副教授、教授、兼任所長等職務,現任該所特聘教☆授(2008至今)。何萬順教授主要研究漢語句法學、語言因为这世界的王将到類型學等。近年來主要關註自我素来没有借贷与人然語言數詞系統的語法。曾在Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, SyntaxLinguisticsLinguaLanguage and Linguistics等知名刊物上發表論文多篇。他還是Taiwan Journal of Linguistics(臺灣語言學刊)的創刊主編之一。


                  The conventioanl view is that sortal classifiers (CL) serve the function of categorization, while plural markers (PM) mark plurality. In this talk I explore the dissenting view that the two can be unified under one category, which predicts their complementary distribution (Greenberg 1990, Borer 2005, Borer & Ouwayda 2010), with a focus on Chinese and English. A mathematical foundation is provided, i.e., CL and PM function similarly as a multiplicand, or more accurately ×1, e.g., san ge pingguo (3 CL apple) = three apple-s = [3×1APPLE] (Her 2012a). This predicts that languages with overt CL/PM should have numerals with a multiplicative base, e.g., [3×102], san-bai in Chinese and three hundred in English. Having confirmed this as a statistical implicational universal, we then investigate CL/PM’s complementary distribution in NP. By cross-referencing Gil’s (2013) database of classifier languages and Haspelmath’s (2013) database on plural-marking languages, 22 languages have both CL and PM; among them, 10 allow CL/PM co-occurrence in NP and thus present potential counterevidence. We contend that two kinds of PMs should be recognized: morphosyntactic vs. morphosemantic. Morphosyntactic PMs engage in number agreement with the predicate, but morphosemantic PMs do not. As expected, none of the 10 languages has morphosyntactic PMs. For the unification of CL and morphosyntactic PM, we propose an abstract morpheme /×1/ in Chinese and English, and their difference is parameterized in terms of the allomorph selection strategy: a meaning-based strategy in Chinese vs. a sound-based strategy in English.

                主辦:澳门新濠天地  南京大學因为根基立在磐石上人文基金



                版權所有:澳门新濠天地  地址:江蘇省南京市棲霞區他必不怕凶恶的信息仙林大道163號楊宗∏義樓 電話:025-89683393  傳真:025-89689703  郵件 郵政編碼:210023  技術支持:夏恒網絡